Bretton Woods 3.0
- 24 February 2025 (7 min read)
Bretton Woods 2.0”, coined by Folkerts-Landau and Garber in 2003, described a monetary order organised around China recycling its surpluses into US debt, thus acting as both the source of the deterioration of the US current account and the enabler of its sustainability. We think that a “Bretton Woods 3.0” framework has emerged, with two major differences with the Folkerts-Landau/Garber model: first, the key counterpart of the US funding need is a mature economy, Europe. Since 2022, Euro area investors have been the largest foreign holders of US government debt. This should be seen as beneficial to the US: it is safer to rely on savings from a political and military ally to continue running spendthrift fiscal policies than on a geopolitical rival such as China. Second, this does not entail a massive US bilateral current account deficit: the US trade deficit with the Euro area in goods is offset by strong exports of intellectual property. This puts the US in a comfortable position.
Why fix something that is not broken? The new Chair of the US Council of Economic Advisors came up with ideas to force Europeans to increase their exposure to US debt, as a “fee” to benefit from US military support and avoid tariffs. This is “overkill” since Europeans are already spontaneously strongly contributing to the US financial sustainability. In his plans, Europeans would also be requested to appreciate their currency vis-à-vis the dollar under a “Mar A Lago Accord”, which – short of financial wizardry which we think is impractical – contradicts the first objective, while weighing on Europe’s already shaky growth performance. A limit to such US coercive approach is that the Europeans’ alternative strategies – e.g. developing their own defence sovereignty – could become economically attractive if the cost of the transatlantic relationship becomes too high. We find it interesting that Friedrich Merz, CDU-leader and winner of last Sunday’s election, has expressed interest for such strategic overhaul. A coalition with SPD could make it happen, but that non-mainstream parties will have the possibility to block the constitutional reforms needed to increase Germany’s fiscal space will however be an obstacle.
Disclaimer
This website is published by AXA Investment Managers Asia Limited (“AXA IM HK”), an entity licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (“SFC”), for general circulation and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments, nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy, sell or enter into any transactions in respect of any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal, tax or any other advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalised recommendation to buy or sell securities under any applicable law or regulation. It has been prepared without taking into account the specific personal circumstances, investment objectives, financial situation, investment knowledge or particular needs of any particular person and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Offering may be made only on the basis of the information disclosed in the relevant offering documents. Please consult independent financial or other professional advisers if you are unsure about any information contained herein.
Due to its simplification, this publication is partial and opinions, estimates and forecasts herein are subjective and subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee such opinions, estimates and forecasts made will come to pass. Actual results of operations and achievements may differ materially. Data, figures, declarations, analysis, predictions and other information in this publication is provided based on our state of knowledge at the time of creation of this publication. Information herein may be obtained from sources believed to be reliable. AXA IM HK has reasonable belief that such information is accurate, complete and up-to-date. To the maximum extent permitted by law, AXA IM HK, its affiliates, directors, officers or employees take no responsibility for the data provided by third party, including the accuracy of such data. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision. References to companies (if any) are for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as investment recommendations or solicitations.
All investment involves risk, including the loss of capital. The value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and that past performance is no guarantee of future returns, investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Investors should not make any investment decision based on this material alone.
Some of the services listed on this Website may not be available for offer to retail investors.
This Website has not been reviewed by the SFC. © 2025 AXA Investment Managers. All rights reserved.